Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission is original and is not currently under consideration elsewhere. If the submission builds on, expands, updates, or substantially revises material that previously appeared in another form, including a blog post, Substack essay, LinkedIn post, newsletter, working paper, SSRN draft, conference presentation, slide deck, teaching material, listserv discussion, or other informal or preliminary publication, the author has disclosed that prior version to the Editor-in-Chief.
  • The submission fits within JLETI’s scope, including law, emerging technology, legal education, legal information, legal research, law librarianship, access to justice, professional responsibility, or the future of legal practice.
  • The manuscript is submitted in Microsoft Word format unless another format has been approved by the Editor-in-Chief.
  • The submission includes a title, author name, author affiliation, author contact information, abstract or short summary, manuscript text, and footnotes or references.
  • All citations, quotations, legal authorities, factual claims, data claims, and web sources have been checked for accuracy and are real, accurate, and verifiable.
  • Where available, URLs, DOIs, archived links, or other identifying information have been provided for cited sources.
  • Any material use of generative AI or similar tools has been disclosed, including the general purpose for which the tool was used.
  • Any financial, professional, institutional, personal, or other potential conflict of interest has been disclosed.
  • Any third-party materials, including images, charts, screenshots, datasets, teaching materials, excerpts, or other copyrighted materials, are properly credited and used lawfully.
  • Any supplemental materials, such as appendices, teaching materials, tool evaluation materials, prompt logs, datasets, source-verification materials, figures, permissions documentation, or disclosure statements, have been uploaded as separate files where appropriate.
  • The author understands that accepted submissions may be edited for clarity, citation accuracy, formatting, metadata, accessibility, PDF production, HTML publication, and compliance with JLETI’s editorial policies.

Author Guidelines

The Journal of Law, Emerging Technology, and Information welcomes submissions from law librarians, faculty, students, lawyers, judges, technologists, legal educators, researchers, policymakers, and other professionals whose work fits within the Journal’s scope.

JLETI publishes rigorous, readable, practical, and interdisciplinary work on law, emerging technology, legal education, legal information, legal research, law librarianship, access to justice, professional responsibility, information governance, legal technology, artificial intelligence, and the future of legal practice.

JLETI considers the following categories of work:

Articles

Suggested Length: 8,000-20,000 words

Longer scholarly pieces that make a sustained contribution to legal scholarship, legal information scholarship, technology law, legal education, or law librarianship.

Make a new submission to the Articles section.

Essays

Suggested Length: 3,000-8,000 words 

Shorter scholarly or reflective pieces that address timely questions or emerging issues.

Make a new submission to the Essays section.

Practitioner Commentary

Suggested Length: 2,000-6,000 words

Practical analysis from lawyers, judges, law librarians, technologists, legal operations professionals, access-to-justice leaders, and other professionals.

Make a new submission to the Practitioner Commentary section.

Teaching and Training Resources

Suggested Length: 2,000-8,000 words

Pieces focused on legal education, legal research instruction, AI literacy, faculty training, student training, or professional development.

Make a new submission to the Teaching and Training Resources section.

AI Scholarship Lab: 

Suggested Length: 1,500-10,000 words

Experimental scholarship that explores how artificial intelligence is changing legal scholarship, legal research, legal education, legal information, authorship, verification, citation practices, legal reasoning, or scholarly publishing.

Submissions may include AI-generated scholarship experiments, human-AI collaborative scholarship, prompt-based legal analysis, model comparison studies, citation or source-verification audits, annotated AI outputs, versioned or living scholarship, scholarly demonstrations, or other experimental formats that do not fit neatly within traditional article categories.

AI Scholarship Lab submissions should be transparent, inspectable, and useful. Authors should explain the purpose of the experiment, disclose the role of any AI system used, describe the human role in designing, editing, reviewing, or verifying the work, and identify any limitations, risks, or unresolved questions. For more information visit the AI Scholarship Lab page. 

Make a new submission to the Articles section.

Tool Evaluations

Suggested Length: 1,500-5,000 words

Structured reviews of AI tools, legal research platforms, legal technology products, legal analytics systems, or information systems used in law, legal education, or law libraries.

Make a new submission to the Tool Evaluations section.

Research Updates

Suggested Length: 1,000-3,000 words

Short-form updates on cases, regulations, policies, technologies, studies, or teaching developments.

Make a new submission to the Research Updates section.

Book Reviews

Suggested Length: 1,000-3,000 words

Reviews of books related to AI, law, legal technology, legal education, information policy, law librarianship, or access to justice.

Make a new submission to the Book Reviews section.

Student Essays

Suggested Length2,000-7,000 words

Student-authored pieces selected through courses, competitions, fellowships, symposia, or submission.

Make a new submission to the Student Essays section.

Originality and Prior Versions

Submissions should be original and should not be under simultaneous consideration elsewhere unless disclosed and approved by the Editor-in-Chief.

JLETI welcomes submissions that develop ideas first shared in informal, preliminary, or professional settings, including blog posts, Substack essays, LinkedIn posts, conference presentations, teaching materials, working papers, slide decks, listserv discussions, or professional commentary. Such submissions may be considered original if they are substantially revised, expanded, updated, or adapted for publication in the Journal. Authors must disclose any prior version or related public dissemination at the time of submission. The Editor-in-Chief will determine whether the submission makes a sufficiently new and independent contribution for publication. 

Submission Format

Submissions should be provided in Microsoft Word format unless another format has been approved by the Editor-in-Chief. Authors should include a title, author name and affiliation, author contact information, abstract or short summary, manuscript text, footnotes or references, and any disclosure statement if applicable.

Authors should upload the manuscript as a Word document and upload any appendices, teaching materials, tool evaluation materials, datasets, figures, prompt logs, source-verification materials, permissions, or disclosure statements as supplemental files. JLETI controls final formatting, PDF production, HTML galley design, metadata, and publication layout.

Citation and Source Verification

Legal submissions should generally follow The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation. Interdisciplinary submissions may use another recognized citation style if approved by the Editor-in-Chief.

All citations, quotations, legal authorities, factual claims, data claims, and web sources must be accurate, complete, and verifiable. Authors may be asked to provide copies, screenshots, archived links, datasets, source files, or other documentation for materials that are difficult to verify.

AI Use and Disclosure

Authors must disclose any meaningful use of generative AI or other artificial intelligence tools in the research, drafting, editing, analysis, citation review, source verification, data analysis, or preparation of a submission.

The disclosure should identify the general nature of the AI use, including whether AI was used to generate text, summarize sources, develop arguments, analyze data, create teaching materials, test prompts, evaluate tools, verify citations, or assist with editing. Authors remain responsible for the accuracy, originality, integrity, and completeness of the submitted work.

For submissions in the AI Scholarship Lab, authors may be asked to provide additional information, such as prompts, prompt logs, model outputs, model names or versions, testing dates, verification methods, limitations, or supplemental materials necessary to make the project transparent and reviewable.

Tool Evaluations

Tool evaluations should be transparent about methodology, limitations, and conflicts of interest. Authors should disclose whether they received free access, compensation, sponsorship, or other benefits; the version of the tool tested; the dates of testing; the testing methodology; the nature of prompts, research tasks, or use cases tested; limitations of the evaluation; and whether results may change as the tool changes.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors must disclose financial, professional, institutional, personal, or other relationships that could reasonably affect judgment, review, or publication integrity.

Review and Publication 

All submissions undergo editorial review. Authors will be notified of the editorial decision and may be asked to revise and resubmit. Accepted submissions may be edited for clarity, citation accuracy, formatting, metadata, accessibility, PDF production, HTML publication, and compliance with JLETI’s editorial policies.

Articles

Suggested Length: 8,000-20,000 words

Longer scholarly pieces that make a sustained contribution to legal scholarship, legal information scholarship, technology law, legal education, or law librarianship.

Essays

Suggested Length: 3,000-8,000 words 

Shorter scholarly or reflective pieces that address timely questions or emerging issues.

Practitioner Commentary

Suggested Length: 2,000-6,000 words

Practical analysis from lawyers, judges, law librarians, technologists, legal operations professionals, access-to-justice leaders, and other professionals.

Teaching and Training Resources

Suggested Length: 2,000-8,000 words

Pieces focused on legal education, legal research instruction, AI literacy, faculty training, student training, or professional development.

Tool Evaluations

Suggested Length: 1,500-5,000 words

Structured reviews of AI tools, legal research platforms, legal technology products, legal analytics systems, or information systems used in law, legal education, or law libraries.

Research Updates

Suggested Length: 1,000-3,000 words

Short-form updates on cases, regulations, policies, technologies, studies, or teaching developments.

Book Reviews

Suggested Length: 1,000-3,000 words

Reviews of books related to AI, law, legal technology, legal education, information policy, law librarianship, or access to justice.

Student Essays

Suggested Length2,000-7,000 words

Student-authored pieces selected through courses, competitions, fellowships, symposia, or submission.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.